Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Reid's shell game moves us closer to the brink


Reid and company perpetrating another political con game moving all of us closer to the brink of armed conflict in America: Here and here.

A increasing percentage of folks, growing tired of all the neo-com Bull Sh**, are saying "Its about time we hit the reset button and get this done and over with so that our children and grandchildren won't have to."

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Don't forget all of the Bill of Rights

The "pen is mightier than the sword?"
Edward Bulwer-Lytton, a British playwright of the nineteenth century is credited with coming up with the now famous phrase "the pen is mightier than the sword." Lytton's main character in his 1839 play Richelieu; Or the Conspiracy made the allusion that the "pen is mightier than the sword...The loud earth breathless! — Take away the sword — States can be saved without it!"
Despite the fact that he was writing theatrical dialog about statecraft, something Niccolo Machiavelli wrote much more adeptly about in his treatise The Prince 326 years earlier, the "pen" phrase has been misused almost more than any other phrase in the English language.
Just last week another newspaper weeny used Lytton's "pen" phrase as a false premise to attempt to make the argument on how we don't need guns and why publishing the names and addresses of concealed handgun permit owners will make us 'safer.' Therefore more drivel for the educated ignoramuses who worship at the alter of statism to delude themselves with and, even better, sources of comedic material on the Internet to amuse a rational, cogent person! A much more balanced op/ed piece here.
Always looking for an opportunity to rebut such humorous irrationalism I promptly penned my own 'mightier than' letter to the editor and sent it to the publication. Who knows if it will be published there? What matters is that it is here:

"Let's not forget any of the Bill of Rights. They are all important. Read them and practice them sometime. You may be surprised with the exhilaration that comes from practicing your Natural Rights. Members of the United States military, having a taken an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” have served, fought, and died so that you may remain free from tyranny. Use those freedoms or lose them.
Anybody—newspaper publisher, playwright, or blogger can publish any public information they wish. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in America, because of their published views newspaper publishers were often tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail while their printing presses were destroyed. Now, as happened recently in New England, citizens simply publish names and contact information of offending publishers and reporters on the Internet and urge people to call them and politely make their views known.
No North Carolina sheriff can legally refuse to issue a citizen, if they meet the established criteria, a concealed handgun permit (CHP). North Carolina is a “shall issue” state. Otherwise, an injured party can go before a judge, establish the facts, and receive a judgment ordering a sheriff to issue them the permit. In lieu of receiving a judgment a citizen can open carry a firearm anywhere that they can conceal carry. This is established in Common Law and North Carolina's Constitution.
Despite the fact that words do mean things and can move others to perform great deeds, if the pen were truly “mightier than the sword” Mao Zedong would have remained a librarian, Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin) would have remained a lawyer, Ioseb Besarionis je J̌uḡašvili (Stalin) would have remained a failed priest, Adolph Hiedler (Hitler) would have remained a water-colorist, Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini would have remained a newspaper editor, Josip Broz Tito would have remained a Daimler automotive test driver, Francisco Franco y Bahamonde would have remained a head of a Spanish military academy, and Saloth Sar (Pol Pot) would have remained a failed radio technician. These tyrants murdered tens of millions of their own people and they didn't use pens.
Events in History are inevitably settled by force or the threat of force and no pen can change that fact. All of the aforementioned tyrants knew and practiced that. They established their autocratic rules by disarming their populaces with universal background 'checks,' universal registration, universal confiscation, and finally with Democide. That is not debatable. Indeed, “power flows from the barrel of a gun." Always." A pen may defame and humiliate you. It won't protect you from a burglar or a tyrant.

Come and Take It!

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Sequestration: You're being Bitch slapped by a liar

What if I told you sequestration was nothing like what the media has been telling you it was?
What if I told you that you're being 'bitch slapped' by a liar (the liar-in-chief) and you don't even know it? Go here if you want to see the Reality. Otherwise, keep living in your 'no place' delusion.


Tuesday, March 5, 2013

What your government has in store for you

Internment camps for political dissidents in the U.S. aren't a conspiracy theory. The Department of Defense document entitled "INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT OPERATIONS" or FM 3-39.40 proves this beyond a shadow of a doubt. Don't believe me? Go here
Organize and prepare or else become a slave and die!

Come and Take it!



Sunday, March 3, 2013

A response to a neo-com novelist turned op/ed scribbler


Those of you who still read newspapers regularly know that there's a lot of disinformation out there. (No kidding!) One of my favorite disinformation sources is the Asheville Citizen-Times. Why do I continue to subscribe to this socialist rag? Put simply, nostalgia. I remember what a decent paper it once was. Oh well, I've got a heart--guilty as charged.
Recently (March 1, 2013) the AC-T published another rant, this time by David Madden, a novelist living in Black Mountain (no folks, don't start calling him yet). Madden's op/ed page rant was Why replace ballots with bullets?.
The man's thinking was so fuzzy (he has no conception about what the 2nd Amendment is about) it was absolutely laughable yet I had to respond to it which I do so here:

"David Madden's Why replace ballots with bullets (AC-T, 3/1/13) demonstrates no understanding of the 2nd Amendment, much less, by inference the rest of our Natural Rights. His false claim that the 'real' issue is “whether a limit may be placed on a type of gun” shows a complete ignorance of what the 2nd Amendment is for and the fact that we are not talking about guns but rifles. Guns are indirect-fire arms. Rifles are direct-fire arms. With a gun you can lay down an artillery barrage to destroy an army. With a rifle you can neutralize a tyrant.

John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government showed by careful inductive and deductive reasoning when and why it the the right of the people to judge themselves “absolved” and make an “appeal to Heaven” with whatever means necessary when a ruler becomes tyrannical. No office-holder can ever change this truth-to-power.

Each day we engage in this silly debate re 'safety' and 'for the children' v. 'assault weapons' and 'high-capacity' magazines solves nothing and leads us inexorably to where these issues will be resolved—the battlefield."